
Today, as we didn’t have a decided debate topic, each of the members spoke out questions in their mind. As we usually focus on one single topic, it was a refreshing experience in our club.
Is Beauty Subjective or Objective?
Is beauty truly in the eye of the beholder, or are there underlying objective standards that guide our judgments? While we often claim “subjective” views, are we truly free from external influences? As the notes indicate, “even when claiming a subjective view, there’s usually an underlying standard guiding our judgment,” shaped by personal experiences, cultural background, and societal norms. The question then becomes, can we ever truly escape bias and perceive things objectively?
Cultural Mixing and Identity: Beyond Static Definitions
Cultures are not stagnant pools; they are rivers constantly flowing and merging. The notes point out that “cultures mix and change over time,” and cultural identity is a complex and evolving concept. Where do we draw the line between cultural appreciation and cultural appropriation? And how can we foster a sense of belonging in an increasingly interconnected world, while respecting the unique traditions and histories of diverse communities?
Biomechanics and the Body: Form, Function, and the Flat Foot Fallacy
From philosophical musings to the mechanics of the human body, we turn to the question of biomechanics. The arch of the foot, designed to absorb force and provide stability, is crucial to our movement. But what happens when this natural design is compromised? The notes highlight that “flat feet can disrupt the natural walking motion,” leading to pain, instability, and an increased risk of falling. This raises questions about the importance of understanding our bodies and addressing physical challenges to maintain optimal health.
Judging Based on Appearances: A Modern Anubis?
Are we guilty of judging books by their covers? Our notes remind us that “sometimes, we judge people based on their outward appearance,” and this can heavily influence our perceptions. If we weigh someone’s actions against their appearance, are we not acting as modern-day Anubis, weighing hearts against feathers? This prompts a crucial discussion on prejudice, bias, and the need to look beyond superficial judgments.
Moral Dilemmas & Justice: The Gun in the Courtroom
When justice fails, does revenge become justifiable? The lecture notes reference a movie scene where a mother brings a gun to court, raising profound questions about morality, ethics, and the limits of the legal system. While the lecturer does not encourage such behavior, the notes express respect for “wanting to find someone capable of continuing to reproduce and continue the human race.” This sparks a debate on the role of emotions in decision-making, the pursuit of justice, and the potential consequences of taking the law into one’s own hands.
Maintaining Institutions: The Necessary Evil?
At what cost do we protect our institutions? The notes suggest that “to protect institutions, sometimes greater forces or measures are used.” Is there a point where the means justify the ends, or are some actions inherently unjustifiable, regardless of the intended outcome? This invites us to critically examine the balance between preserving order and upholding ethical principles.